Live
1.00
Verified Asset
High Efficiency

Table a manger.

Metabolic profile analysis. Technical breakdown of Table a manger and its impact on skeletal muscle retention and daily energy expenditure.

Total Energy4kcal
Bio-Protein64g
Carbohydrates5g
Total Lipids5g

Nutritional Efficiency Report

Table a manger is a very low-calorie food with elite-protein content. At 4 kcal per 100g, it delivers 64g of protein — representing 6400% of its total caloric load. Carbohydrates account for 500% and fats for 1125% of calories.

"Efficiency Score 1.00 — this asset ranks in the top tier of the DataFood database for protein delivery per calorie. Optimal for fat loss, lean bulking, and body recomposition phases."

With 5g of carbs per 100g, it suits cyclical keto and low-carb approaches.

With only 4 kcal per 100g, Table a manger is a high-volume food — you can consume a large serving while keeping total caloric intake controlled. This makes it particularly effective for hunger management in deficit phases.

Protocol Compatibility

Ketosis Impact

With 5g of carbs per 100g, it suits cyclical keto and low-carb approaches.

Thermic Effect (TEF)

Protein content of 64g per 100g triggers a significant Thermic Effect of Food. The body expends approximately 20–30% of protein calories during digestion, yielding a net caloric benefit compared to equivalent fat or carbohydrate sources.

Expand Your Protocol.

Based on the metabolic profile of Table a manger, these related data nodes are most relevant to your nutrition architecture:

Integrate Asset.

Use the clinical weekly planner to distribute Table a manger across your metabolic windows.

Generate Weekly Protocol

Input physical metrics to generate a synchronized 7-day protocol.

1. Biological Metrics

2. Dietary Logic

Institutional Disclaimer: The nutritional data provided for Table a manger is derived from clinical databases and algorithmic estimation. This report is for metabolic infrastructure planning only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a clinical nutritionist before implementing aggressive deficit protocols.